Études et résultats

Études sur les barrières à l’accès à l’IVG sûre

LIMITES D’ÂGE GESTATIONNEL

  • Pinter B, Aubeny E, Bartfai G, Loeber O, Ozalp S, Webb A. Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10: 51–8. Is buspirone available in uk

DÉLAI DE RÉFLEXION OBLIGATOIRE

  • Heller R, Purcell C, Mackay L, Caird L, Cameron ST. Barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy in a remote and rural setting: a qualitative study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 123: 1684–91.
    Female viagra online order

OBJECTION DE CONSCIENCE

  • Berer M. Termination of pregnancy as emergency obstetric care: the interpretation of Catholic health policy and the consequences for pregnant women: an analysis of the death of Savita Halappanavar in Ireland and similar cases. Reprod Health Matters 2013; 21: 9–17.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684182
  • Campbell M. Conscientious objection and the Council of Europe: The right to conscientious objection in lawful medical care Resolution 1763 (2010) Resolution adopted by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly. Med Law Rev 2011; 19: 467–75.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21798996
  • Chavkin W, Leitman L, Polin K, for Global Doctors for Choice. Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: A White Paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2013; 123: S41–56.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24332234
  • De Zordo S. Interruption volontaire de grossesse et clause de conscience en Italie et en Espagne, entre droits des femmes et « droits » du fœtus/patient. Sociol Santé; 38: 107–29.
  • De Zordo S, Mishtal J, Anton L. A Fragmented Landscape Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. Berghahn Books, 2016. https://www.berghahnbooks.com/title/DeZordoFragmented
  • Fiala C, Gemzell Danielsson K, Heikinheimo O, Guðmundsson JA, Arthur J. Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing ‘conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2016; 21: 201–6.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26838273
  • Lertxundi R, Ibarrondo O, Merki-Feld GS, Rey-Novoa M, Rowlands S, Mar J. Proposal to inform European institutions regarding the regulation of conscientious objection to abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2016; 213: 198–200.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26986562
  • Morrell KM, Chavkin W. Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 27: 333–8.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26241174

Stigmate

  • De Zordo S. From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluña. Glob Public Heal An Int J Res Policy Pract 2017; 1–13.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278744
  • De Zordo S, Mishtal J. Physicians and Abortion: Provision, Political Participation and Conflicts on the Ground-The Cases of Brazil and Poland. Women’s Heal Issues 2011; 21: S32–6.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530836

Autres barrières

  • Cochrane RA, Cameron ST. Attitudes of Scottish abortion care providers towards provision of abortion after 16 weeks’ gestation within Scotland. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2013; 18: 215–20.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23521135
  • De Zordo S, Mishtal J. Physicians and Abortion: Provision, Political Participation and Conflicts on the Ground-The Cases of Brazil and Poland. Women’s Heal Issues 2011; 21: S32–6.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21530836
  • Doran F, Nancarrow S. Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care 2015; 41: 170–80.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106103

Améliorer l'accès à l'IVG

  • Caird L, Cameron ST, Hough T, Mackay L, Glasier A. Initiatives to close the gap in inequalities in abortion provision in a remote and rural UK setting. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care 2015; 42: 68 LP-70.
    https://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/42/1/68

Études sur les voyages pour IVG en Europe

  • Aiken ARA, Gomperts R, Trussell J. Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at-home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a population-based analysis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 124: 1208–15.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748001
  • Bloomer F, O’Dowd K. Restricted access to abortion in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: exploring abortion tourism and barriers to legal reform. Health Sex. 2014; 16: 366–80.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24617662
  • Caird L, Cameron ST, Hough T, Mackay L, Glasier A. Initiatives to close the gap in inequalities in abortion provision in a remote and rural UK setting. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care 2015; 42: 68 LP-70.
    https://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/42/1/68
  • Gerdts C, De Zordo S, Mishtal J, Barr-Walker J, Lohr, Lohr PA. Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2016; 21: 401–7.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27539129
  • Loeber O, Wijsen C. Factors Influencing the Percentage of Second Trimester Abortions in the Netherlands Factors Influencing the Percentage of Second Trimester Abortions in the Netherlands. Reprod Heal Matters 2008; 16: 31–30.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18772081
  • Rossiter A. Ireland’s hidden diaspora: the ‘abortion trail’ and the making of a London-Irish underground 1980–2000. IASC Publishing. 2009.
  • Rossiter A, Sexton M. The other Irish journey: A survey update of Northern Irish women attending British abortion clinics, 2000/2001. 2000. https://www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/download/irish_document.pdf

Études sur les barrières à l’accès à l’IVG et sur les déplacements par pays

France

Irlande

  • Aiken ARA, Gomperts R, Trussell J. Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at-home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a population-based analysis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 124: 1208–15.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748001
  • Berer M. Termination of pregnancy as emergency obstetric care: the interpretation of Catholic health policy and the consequences for pregnant women:an analysis of the death of Savita Halappanavar in Ireland and similar cases. Reprod Health Matters 2013; 21: 9–17.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684182
  • Bloomer F, O’Dowd K. Restricted access to abortion in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: exploring abortion tourism and barriers to legal reform. Health Sex. 2014; 16: 366–80.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24617662
  • Gilmartin M, White A. Interrogating Medical Tourism: Ireland, Abortion, and Mobility Rights. Signs J Women Cult Soc 2010; 36: 275–80.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21114071

  • Mishtal J. Quiet Contestations of Irish Abortion Law: Abortion Politics in Flux? In: Transcending Borders: Abortion in the Past and Present, Pelgrave Macmillan 2017.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-48399-3_12

  • Rossiter A. Ireland’s hidden diaspora: the ‘abortion trail’ and the making of a London-Irish underground 1980–2000. IASC Publishing. 2009.
  • Rossiter A, Sexton M. The other Irish journey: A survey update of Northern Irish women attending British abortion clinics, 2000/2001. 2000. https://www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/download/irish_document.pdf
  • Smyth, L. ‘And Nobody Was Any the Wiser’: Irish Abortion Rights and the European Union. In: Sexual Politics and the European Union, Berghahn Books 1996: 109-130.

Pologne

Italie

  • Chavkin W, Swerdlow L, Fifield J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: An international comparative multiple-case study. Health Hum Rights 2017; 19: 55–68. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5473038/
  • De Zordo S. From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluña. Glob Public Heal An Int J Res Policy Pract 2017; March:1–13.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278744
  • De Zordo S. Interruption volontaire de grossesse et clause de conscience en Italie et en Espagne, entre droits des femmes et « droits » du fœtus/patient. Sociol Santé; 38: 107–29.
  • De Zordo S. ‘Good doctors do not object’: Obstetricians-Gynaecolosists’ Perspectives on Conscientious Objection to Abortion Care and their Engagement with Pro-abortion Rights Protests in Italy. In: A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books, 2016
    https://www.berghahnbooks.com/title/DeZordoFragmented#toc
  • Morrell KM, Chavkin W. Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 27: 333–8.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26241174

Pays-Bas

  • Loeber O, Wijsen C. Factors Influencing the Percentage of Second Trimester Abortions in the Netherlands Factors Influencing the Percentage of Second Trimester Abortions in the Netherlands. Reprod Heal Matters 2008; 16: 31–30.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18772081

Spagne

  • De Zordo S. From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluña. Glob Public Heal An Int J Res Policy Pract 2017: 1–13.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278744

RU

  • Caird L, Cameron ST, Hough T, Mackay L, Glasier A. Initiatives to close the gap in inequalities in abortion provision in a remote and rural UK setting. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care 2015; 42: 68 LP-70.
    https://jfprhc.bmj.com/content/42/1/68
  • Francome C. Irish Women Who Seek Abortions in England. Fam Plann Perspect 1992; 24: 265–8.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2135856?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

  • Gerdts C, DeZordo S, Mishtal J, Barr-Walker J, Lohr, Lohr PA. Experiences of women who travel to England for abortions: an exploratory pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2016; 21: 401–7.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27539129

  • Heller R, Purcell C, Mackay L, Caird L, Cameron ST. Barriers to accessing termination of pregnancy in a remote and rural setting: a qualitative study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 123: 1684–91.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.14117/abstract

Données et statistiques sur l’IVG provenant de pays qui font objet d’intérêt pour cette étude

France

Allemagne

Italie

Spagne

RU

Lois sur l’IVG et documents juridiques

Studies on abortion laws

European level laws and legal documents

Country level laws and legal documents

Nos résultats de recherche

Partagez votre histoire

Nous sommes conscientes des grandes difficultés auxquelles sont confrontées les femmes qui souhaitent interrompre leur grossesse en Europe. C’est pourquoi nous vous invitons à partager votre expérience avec l’équipe du projet. Grâce à vous, nous pourrons améliorer notre étude et créer une base d’informations utiles pour toute la communauté.

Partagez votre histoire



Les chercheuses étudieront votre histoire et la publieront (si vous avez donné votre accord) une semaine après que vous l’aurez envoyée. Si vous souhaitez annuler votre envoi, ou que vous avez changé d’avis concernant votre participation à l’étude, ou simplement que vous n’avez pas coché la bonne case lors de l’envoi de votre histoire, veuillez, s’il vous plait, vous adresser à l’équipe de chercheuses à l’adresse e-mail indiquée ci-contre.

Europe Abortion Access ProjectEuroe Research Council Universitad de Barcelona

This project has received funding from the European Reseach Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme BAR2LEGAB-680004